2010 Opinion and Summaries

JANUARY 2010

DISCLAIMER:
These opinions are subject to the parties' motion for reconsideration, the Court's reconsideration, and editorial changes made by the Reporter of Decisions.

An opinion designated as "Final Copy" is the Supreme Court's official opinion as published in the advance sheets.

Please Note: Adobe Acrobat Reader is necessary to read the following opinions. You may download Adobe Acrobat Reader here if necessary. Thank you.

January 25, 2010

• S09G1287. THE STATE v. SMITH
• S09A1376. WESLEY v. THE STATE
• S09A1445. BROUGHTON v. DOUGLAS COUNTY BOARD of ELECTIONS et al.
  S09A1446. QUARTERMAN v. DOUGLAS COUNTY BOARD of ELECTIONS et al.
• S09A1451. ROBERTS v. THE STATE
• S09A1468. HALL v. THE STATE
• S09A1469. BALL v. THE STATE
• S09A1487. JACKSON v. BITTICK et al.
• S09A1536. HALL, WARDEN v. LANCE
  S09X1538. LANCE v. HALL, WARDEN
• S09A1544. FUTCH v. THE STATE
• S09A1588. SETLOCK v. SETLOCK
• S09A1631. ROGERS v. THE STATE
• S09A1649. COOK v. THE STATE
• S09A1677. LAWRENCE v. THE STATE
• S09A1800. ALLEN v. THE STATE
• S09A1801. BRIDGES v. THE STATE
• S09A1802. COLEY v. CHASTEEN, JUDGE et al. (RULE 59)
• S09A1839. MORELAND v. THE STATE
• S09A1860. ZACKERY v. THE STATE
• S09A1935. EAST GEORGIA LAND and DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC v. BAKER et al.
• S09A1995. LOADHOLT v. THE STATE
• S09C2010. JACKSON v. THE STATE
• S10A0048. JULIUS v. THE STATE
• S09Y0115. IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM HENRY TOLER
• S10Y0161. IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN ZAGORIA
• S10Y0229. IN THE MATTER OF MARCUS L. VICKERS
• S10Y0235. IN THE MATTER OF SYLVIA ANN MARTIN
  
  

February 2010

DISCLAIMER:
These opinions are subject to the parties' motion for reconsideration, the Court's reconsideration, and editorial changes made by the Reporter of Decisions.

An opinion designated as "Final Copy" is the Supreme Court's official opinion as published in the advance sheets.

Please Note: Adobe Acrobat Reader is necessary to read the following opinions. You may download Adobe Acrobat Reader here if necessary. Thank you

February 1, 2010 - SUMMARIES for NOTEWORTHY OPINIONS

• S09G0997. STEPP v. THE STATE
• S09G1210. THE STATE v. GARDNER
• S09A1382. ARNOLD v. THE STATE
• S09F1609. SALMON-DAVIS v. DAVIS
• S09A1697. ARMSTRONG v. THE STATE
• S09F1706. BANKSTON v. LACHMAN
• S09A1713. SHIVERS v. THE STATE
• S09A1759. JOHNSON v. THE STATE
• S09A1766. MIKELL v. THE STATE
• S09F1798. ELLIS v. ELLIS
• S09F1836. LARIZZA v. LARIZZA
• S09A1852. MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE
• S09A1857. PETERSON v. HARRELL
• S09H1936. FLINT v. THE STATE
• S09A2036, 2037, 2038. MARSHALL v. THE STATE (3 cases)
• S09A2064. DEVEGA v. THE STATE
• S10A0021. ALLIANCE THREE PROPERTIES, LLC v. ROBINSON et al. (RULE 59)
• S10A0044. R.A.F., b/n/f DAVID FRIEDMAN et al. v. ROBINSON, COMR., et al.
• S09Y1855. IN THE MATTER OF PATRICK J. SMITH
• S10Z0262. IN THE MATTER OF PAUL WENDELL CALHOUN
• S10Y0332. IN THE MATTER OF HOWARD GEOFFREY SLADE
• S10Y0388. IN THE MATTER OF GARY GILBERT GUICHARD
• S10Y0399. IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL B. SESHUL, JR.
• S10Z0415. IN THE MATTER OF STEPHEN FRIEDBERG
• S10Y0528. IN THE MATTER OF LEA LANGE LONDON
• S10Y0538. IN THE MATTER OF TRENT EDWARD WRIGHT
• S10Y0572. IN THE MATTER OF STANLEY KAKOL, JR.
  

February 8, 2010 - SUMMARIES for NOTEWORTHY OPINIONS

S09G1218. BRODA v. DZIWURA

S09F1457. WINDHAM v. ARAYA

S09A1490. KNOX et al. v. WILSON et al.

S09A1527. LUCKY v. THE STATE

S09Q1585. HOLMES et al. v. GRUBMAN et al.

S09A1650. SPENCER v. THE STATE

S09F1667. MOORE v. MOORE

S09A1684. REID v. THE STATE

S09A1804. MANN v. BLALOCK

S09A1856. HATCHER v. THE STATE

S09A1878. DENTON v. THE STATE

S09A1998. ADAMS v. THE STATE

S09A2015. STINSON v. THE STATE

S09Y1867. IN THE MATTER OF SABRINA K. BOZEMAN

S10Y0411. IN THE MATTER OF BENJAMIN LANIER BAGWELL

February 15, 2009 - SUMMARY for NOTEWORTHY OPINION

• S09A1475. SPURLOCK  v. DEPARTMENT of HUMAN RESOURCES et al.
  
  

March 2010

DISCLAIMER:
These opinions are subject to the parties' motion for reconsideration, the Court's reconsideration, and editorial changes made by the Reporter of Decisions.

An opinion designated as "Final Copy" is the Supreme Court's official opinion as published in the advance sheets.

Please Note: Adobe Acrobat Reader is necessary to read the following opinions. You may download Adobe Acrobat Reader here if necessary. Thank you

March 1, 2010 - SUMMARIES for NOTEWORTHY OPINIONS

• S09G0980. SUMMERLIN et al. v. GEORGIA PINES COMMUNITY SERVICE BOARD
• S09G1045. TRAWICK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT of REVENUE
• S09G1131. SUMTER ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY et al.
• S09A1435. KAPLAN et al. v. CITY of SANDY SPRINGS et al.
• S09G1465. CANTY v. THE STATE
• S09A1602. AMERICAN LIEN FUND LLC v. DIXON et al.
• S09A1604. ROONEY v. THE STATE
• S09A1623. DARROCH v. WILLIS 3-22-10 Substitute Opinion
• S09A1644. LY et al. v. JIMMY CARTER COMMONS, LLC et al.
• S09P1745. STINSKI v. THE STATE
• S09A1757. HAMILTON v. THE STATE
• S09A1790. SMITH v. HALLUM
• S09Q1846. STATE AUTO PROPERTY and CASUALTY COMPANY v. MATTY et al.
• S09A1903. GUYSE v. THE STATE
• S09A1961. ROBERTS v. THARP
• S09F2030. KURIATNYK v.KURIATNYK
• S09Q2033. PHILLIPS et al. v. MOORE
• S09A2056. DAVIS v. DUNN
• S10A0136. MANLEY v. THE STATE On Reconsideration, judgment vacated.  New opinion issued April 9.
  S10A0137. ALLEN v. THE STATE
• S10A0584. THOMAS v. LEE et al.
• S10Y0353. IN THE MATTER OF RALPH JAMES VILLANI
• S10Y0685. IN THE MATTER OF DEBORAH K. RICE
• S10Y0690. IN THE MATTER OF FREDERICK A. GARDNER

• S09G1015. THE STATE v. NEJAD
• S09G1127. MEADOW SPRINGS, LLC v. IH RIVERDALE, LLC et al.
• S09G1130. DIXON v. THE STATE
• S09P1428. HUMPHREYS v. THE STATE
• S09A1458. FRAZER, WARDEN v. MATHIS
• S09A1476. MERRITT v. THE STATE
• S09A1512. ROBERTS, WARDEN v. COOPER
• S09A1543. SMITH et al. v. SALON BAPTISTE et al. 4-9-10 Substitute opinion issued.
• S09Q1613. REYNOLDS et al. v. INFINITY GENERAL INSURANCE CO. f/n/a COVENTRY INSURANCE CO.
• S09A1624. SENTINEL OFFENDER SERVICES, LLC v. HARRELSONet al.
  S09A1625. JONES v. HARRELSON et al.
  S09X1626. HARRELSON v. JONES et al.
• S09G1664. SOUTHSTAR ENERGY SERVICES, LLC v. ELLISON et al.
• S09A1807. GLIEMMO et al. v. COUSINEAU et al.
• S09A1847. STEWART v. THE STATE
• S09A1900. RAINER v. STATE of GEORGIA et al.
• S09A1956. BROWN, WARDEN v. BASKIN
• S09A1964. TUNISON et al. v. HARPER
• S09A1977. WRIGHT v. ST. LAWRENCE, SHERIFF
• S09A2076. STEVENS v. THE STATE
• S10A0053, S10A0054. WITCHER, ADMR. v. JSD PROPERTIES, LLC et al.
• S10A0245. KING v. THE STATE
• S10A0339. MCBRIDE v. MURRAY, COMR.
• S10A0567. MIKELL v. THE STATE
• S09Y1539. IN THE MATTER OF DERRICK ALEXANDER POPE
• S10Y0571. IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL J. C. SHAW
• S10Y0618. IN THE MATTER OF IKE A. HUDSON
• S10Y0809. IN THE MATTER OF CRAIG STEVEN MATHIS
• S10Y0814. IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS P. BURKE

March 22, 2010 - SUMMARIES for NOTEWORTHY OPINIONS

• S09G0990. HUFF, TAX COMMR. v. HARPAGON COMPANY, LLC
• S09A1413. CARDINAL ROBOTICS, INC. v. MOODY, EXR.
• S09A1432. ATLANTA OCULOPLASTIC SURGERY, P.C., d/b/a OCULUS v. NESTLEHUTT et al.
• S09A1453. KRAUSE v. THE STATE
  S09A1454. CHESSER v. THE STATE
• S09A1669. PRICE v. PRICE
• S09A1705. McKIERNAN v. THE STATE
• S09F1718. NEWMAN v. PATTON
• S09A1799. BRALEY v. CITY of FOREST PARK
• S09A1862. HALL, WARDEN v. LEWIS
• S09A1883. WATSON v. MATTHEWS, JUDGE
• S09A1923. JOHNSON v. THE STATE
• S09A2016. DEKALB COUNTY v. PERDUE et al.
• S09A2025. SHARP v. THE STATE

March 25, 2010 - SUMMARY for NOTEWORTHY OPINION

PLEASE NOTE: The opinions listed below decide a second-term appeal, which must be concluded by the end of the January Term on April 14, 2010, motions for reconsideration, if any, must be filed and received in the Clerk's Office by 4:30 p.m. on Monday, April 5, 2010.

• S09A1510. MONTGOMERY et al. v. BARROW et al.
• S09A1831. GEORGIA STATE LICENSING BOARD FOR RESIDENTIAL AND GENERAL CONTRACTORS v. ALLEN et al.
• S09A1951. WEIS v. THE STATE

March 26, 2010 - SUMMARY for NOTEWORTHY OPINION

PLEASE NOTE: The opinions listed below decide a second-term appeal, which must be concluded by the end of the January Term on April 14, 2010, motions for reconsideration, if any, must be filed and received in the Clerk's Office by 4:30 p.m. on Monday, April 5, 2010.

• S09A2068. OWENS v. THE STATE

March 29, 2010 - SUMMARIES for NOTEWORTHY OPINIONS

• S09G1508. HICKS v. HEARD
• S10A0050. BOWIE v. THE STATE
• S10A0059. HUTCHISON v. JARRIEL, WARDEN
• S10A0153. WATKINS v. ANEGUNDI
• S10A0254. DAVIS v. THE STATE 5-17-10 Substitute opinion - substantive changes made.
• S10F0372. MICHEL v. MICHEL
• S10A0461. WILLIAMS v. THE STATE
• S10A0471. TODD v. TODD 6-1-10 Substitute opinion - substantive changes made.
• S10A0566. THOMPSON v. THE STATE
• S10A0607. THOMPSON v. THE STATE
• S10Y0807. IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY SCOTT DENNY

April 2010

DISCLAIMER:
These opinions are subject to the parties' motion for reconsideration, the Court's reconsideration, and editorial changes made by the Reporter of Decisions.

An opinion designated as "Final Copy" is the Supreme Court's official opinion as published in the advance sheets.

Please Note: Adobe Acrobat Reader is necessary to read the following opinions. You may download Adobe Acrobat Reader here if necessary. Thank you

April 9, 2010

• S10A0136. MANLEY v. THE STATE 6-28-10  Substitute opinion issued
  S10A0137. ALLEN v. THE STATE

April 19, 2010 - SUMMARIES for NOTEWORTHY OPINIONS

• S10Q0041. STAMPS v. JFB PROPERTIES, LLC et al.
• S10A0062. ALFORD v. THE STATE
• S10A0063. JOHNSON v. ROBERTS, WARDEN
• S10A0068. McILWAIN v. THE STATE
• S10A0075. HENDERSON v. HUNTER, JUDGE
• S10A0165. PARRIS v. DOUTHIT
• S10A0177. HICKS v. THE STATE 6-7-10  Substitute opinion issued.  
• S10A0209. MADRIGAL v. THE STATE
• S10Y0213. IN THE MATTER OF MARCUS STAN BALLEW 8-18-10  Substitute opinion issued - vote amended
• S10Y0470. IN THE MATTER OF SCHUMAKER
• S10Y0727. IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY BROOKS KENT
• S10Y0868. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN M. B. LEWIS IV
• S10Y0997. IN THE MATTER OF KINDALL GRANT

MAY 2010

DISCLAIMER:
These opinions are subject to the parties' motion for reconsideration, the Court's reconsideration, and editorial changes made by the Reporter of Decisions.

An opinion designated as "Final Copy" is the Supreme Court's official opinion as published in the advance sheets.

Please Note: Adobe Acrobat Reader is necessary to read the following opinions. You may download Adobe Acrobat Reader here if necessary. Thank you

May 3, 2010 - SUMMARIES for NOTEWORTHY OPINIONS

• S10F0032 . RANK v. RANK
• S10A0163. MARION v. THE STATE
• S10A0166. THOMAS v. FREEMAN, SHERIFF
• S10A0276. DYER v. THE STATE
  S10A0709. ROZIER v. THE STATE
• S10A0380. WILLIAMS v. CITY of ATLANTA et al.
• S10A0278. JONES v. FOSTER
• S10Q0341. WORLD HARVEST CHURCH, INC. v. GUIDEONE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
• S10A0428. ROBINSON v. THE STATE 6-7-10  Substitute opinion issued.  
  S10A0429. WOODS v. THE STATE
• S10A0611. BARROW, Warden v. BARKER
• S10A0638. HOLLINS v. THE STATE
• S10Y0771. IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL B. WALLACE
• S10Y1130. IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL B.SESHUL, JR.

May 17, 2010 - SUMMARIES for NOTEWORTHY OPINIONS

• S09G1523. THE STATE v. ANDERSON
• S09G2004. HOUSTON COUNTY v. HARRELL
• S10A0102. WINDSOR et al. v. CITY of ATLANTA
• S10F0130. HOLMES v. ROBERSON-HOLMES
• S10A0131. HOOD v. TODD
• S10A0148. SANFORD v. THE STATE
• S10A0157. ELLIS v. THE STATE
• S10A0221. SWANK et al. v. DENNEY et al. (RULE 59)
• S10A0254. DAVIS v. THE STATE 5-17-10 Substitute opinion - substantive changes made.
• S10A0267. SIMMONS, CAVEATOR et al. v. HARMS, PROPOUNDER
• S10A0296. STOKES v. THE STATE
• S10A0382. LIZANA v. THE STATE
• S10A0462. HIGGINBOTHAM v. THE STATE
• S10A0467. WILLIAMS v. THE STATE
• S10A0472. VERGARA v. THE STATE
• S10A0488. WILLIAMS v. THE STATE
• S10A0496. ONONYE v. EZEOFOR
• S10A0529. HAYNES v. THE STATE
• S10A0532. JAKUPOVIC v. THE STATE
• S10A0594. WHITE v. THE STATE
• S10A0603. LEWIS V. THE STATE
• S10A0608. DURRENCE v. THE STATE
• S10A0705. NOBLE v. THE STATE
• S10A0776. SIGMAN v. THE STATE
• S10Y0981. IN THE MATTER OF NERRYLLE MANNING-WALLACE

JUNE 2010

DISCLAIMER:
These opinions are subject to the parties' motion for reconsideration, the Court's reconsideration, and editorial changes made by the Reporter of Decisions.

An opinion designated as "Final Copy" is the Supreme Court's official opinion as published in the advance sheets.

Please Note: Adobe Acrobat Reader is necessary to read the following opinions. You may download Adobe Acrobat Reader here if necessary. Thank you

June 1, 2010 - SUMMARIES for NOTEWORTHY OPINIONS

• S08G1152. PRESLEY v. THE STATE
• S09G1928. E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY v. WATERS et al.
• S10A0248. ROSE v. THE STATE
• S10A0471. TODD v. TODD 6-1-10 Substitute opinion - substantive changes made
• S10P0477. TATE v. THE STATE
• S10A0313. WHITEHEAD v. THE STATE
• S10A0599. HOGSED v. THE STATE
• S10A0994. BAKER v. WELLSTAR HEALTH SYSTEMS, d/b/a WELLSTAR KENNESTONE HOSPITAL et al.
• S10Y0962. IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES PHILIP GIALLANZA
• S10Y1139. IN THE MATTER OF BENJAMIN S. EICHHOLZ
• S10Y1264. IN THE MATTER OF LEA LANGE LONDON

June 7, 2010 - SUMMARIES for NOTEWORTHY OPINIONS

• S10A0082. JONES v. THE STATE
• S10A0172. THE STATE v. LATTIMORE
• S10A0324 . CUTRER v. THE STATE
• S10A0326. DOCKERY v. THE STATE
• S10A0335. SOSNIAK v. THE STATE
• S10A0397. STATE of GEORGIA ex rel. DOYLE v. FREDERICK J.HANNA & ASSOCIATES, P. C.
• S10A0446. MULLINS v. THE STATE
• S10F0516. DUPREE v. DUPREE
• S10A0674. MOON v. THE STATE
• S10A0765. MEARIDY v. THE STATE
• S10A0804. LOWE v. THE STATE
• S10F0874. NORMAN v. AULT
• S10A0885. REEVES et al. v. NEWMAN et al.
  S10X0887. NEWMAN et al. v. REEVES et al.
• S10Y1258. IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL J. C. SHAW

June 28, 2010 - SUMMARIES for NOTEWORTHY OPINIONS

• S09G1219. HNTB GEORGIA, INC. v. HAMILTON-KING, ADMRX., et al. 7-26-10  Substitute opinion
  S09G1224. PLANT IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, INC., d/b/a SEABOARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. HAMILTON-KING, ADMRX., et al.
• S09G1254. THE STATE v. BURKE
• S09G1257. THORNTON v. GEORGIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
• S09G1578. HOLLIE v. THE STATE
• S09G1700. SMITH v. THE STATE
• S09G1945. OPENSIDED MRI of ATLANTA, LLC et al. v. CHANDLER et al.
• S09G2081. BROOKFIELD COUNTRY CLUB, INC. v. ST. JAMES-BROOKFIELD, LLC
• S10A0070. THE STATE v. JACKSON et al. 7-26-10  Substitute opinion
  
• S10A0154 . DAVIS v. THE STATE
• S10Q0203. ANTHONY et al. v. AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE SERVICES, INC., f/k/a AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE, INC.
  et al.
• S10A0208 . STOVALL v. THE STATE
• S10F0299. SPONSLER v. SPONSLER
• S10A0323. BARNES v. THE STATE
• S10A0365. WESTMORELAND v. THE STATE
  S10A0367. WILLIAMS v. THE STATE
• S10A0374. PHAN v. THE STATE
• S10A0384. HERRIN v. HERRIN
• S10A0393. WILLIS v. THE STATE
• S10A0452. GONZALEZ v. CROCKET, f/k/a GONZALEZ
• S10A0453. SPENCER v. THE STATE
• S10G0459. COVINGTON SQUARE ASSOCIATES, LLC v. INGLES MARKETS, INC.
• S10A0518. WALKER et al. v. CROMARTIE et al.
• S10F0553. WIER v. WIER
• S10A0556. TAYLOR v. THE STATE
• S10A0580. WHITE v. THE STATE
• S10A0598. WILLIAMS v. THE STATE
• S10Y0635. IN THE MATTER OF SAI HYUN LEE
• S10Y0819, 0821, 0822. IN THE MATTER OF DERRICK L. WALLACE
• S10Y1025. IN THE MATTER OF MORRIS P. FAIR, JR. 7-26-10 Vacated on Reconsideration
• S10Z1144. INQUIRY CONCERNING JUDGE KENNETH E. FOWLER
• S10Y1151. IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS EDWIN SASSER III
• S10Y1277. IN THE MATTER OF DONALD KEITH KNIGHT, JR.

JULY 2010

DISCLAIMER:
These opinions are subject to the parties' motion for reconsideration, the Court's reconsideration, and editorial changes made by the Reporter of Decisions.

An opinion designated as "Final Copy" is the Supreme Court's official opinion as published in the advance sheets.

Please Note: Adobe Acrobat Reader is necessary to read the following opinions. You may download Adobe Acrobat Reader here if necessary. Thank you

July 5, 2010 - SUMMARIES for NOTEWORTHY OPINIONS

• S09G0510. GRAMMENS v. DOLLAR et al.
• S10A0092. KENDRICK v. THE STATE
• S10A0103. WILLIAMS, WARDEN v. MOODY
• S10A0220. THE STATE v. BROWN
• S10A0231, 0232. STRONG v. HOLDEN
• S10A0239. HUCKABEE v. THE STATE 7-27-10  Substitute opinion
  
• S10A0392. BODY of CHRIST OVERCOMING CHURCH of GOD, INC. v. BRINSON
• S10F0451. KLARDIE v. KLARDIE
• S10A0497. CHILDS v. THE STATE
• S10A0563. DANBERT et al. v. NORTH GEORGIA LAND VENTURES LLC et al.
• S10Y1067. IN THE MATTER OF DENISE F. HEMMANN 7-12-10  Opinion vacated - new opinion issued PRESS RELEASE

July 12, 2010 - SUMMARIES for NOTEWORTHY OPINIONS

Please note: It is ordered that a motion for reconsideration, if any, must be filed and received in the Clerk's office by 4:30 p.m. on Thursday, July 22, 2010.

• S09G1177. COWART et al. v. WIDENER et al. 7-26-10  Substitute opinion
  
• S09G1927. ADAMS v. THE STATE
• S09G2058. BROGDON v. THE STATE
• S10A0173. BELL v. THE STATE
• S10Q0193. SCHORR et al. v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.
• S10A0256. CHANNELL et al. v. HOUSTON
• S10A0363. HENDERSON, WARDEN v. HAMES
• S10A0533, 0534, 0535. REGISTE v. THE STATE
• S10A0866. HEARD v. THE STATE
• S10A0858. SEE et al. v. MITCHELL, EXTRX.
• S10A0948. PHILLIPS v. THE STATE
• S10A0982. SAINT, ADMR., et al. v. WILLIAMS
• S10A1107. CITY of HOSCHTON et al. v. HORIZON COMMUNITIES, LLC et al.
• S10Y0811. IN THE MATTER OF H. OWEN MADDUX
• S10Y1067. IN THE MATTER OF DENISE F. HEMMANN PRESS RELEASE
• S10Y1243. IN THE MATTER OF CLARK JONES-LEWIS
• S10Y1308. IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL H. GRAHAM
• S10Y1410. IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD R. HARSTE
• S10Y1473. IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY G. GILLEY

July 14, 2010

Please note: It is ordered that a motion for reconsideration, if any, must be filed and received in the Clerk's office by 4:30 p.m. on Friday, July 23, 2010.

• S10A0383. HIGHTOWER v. THE STATE
  S10A0589. JOHNSON v. THE STATE

July 23, 2010 - SUMMARY for NOTEWORTHY OPINION

Please note: It is ordered that a motion for reconsideration, if any, must be filed and received in the Clerk's office by 4:30 p.m. on Monday, August 2, 2010.

• S10A0258. DEEN et al. v. STEVENS et al.

SEPTEMBER 2010

DISCLAIMER:
These opinions are subject to the parties' motion for reconsideration, the Court's reconsideration, and editorial changes made by the Reporter of Decisions.

An opinion designated as "Final Copy" is the Supreme Court's official opinion as published in the advance sheets.

Please Note: Adobe Acrobat Reader is necessary to read the following opinions. You may download Adobe Acrobat Reader here if necessary. Thank you

September 7, 2010 - SUMMARY for NOTEWORTHY OPINION

• S10A1770. HORTON v. JOHNSON, Superintendent of Elections